Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children with Cochlear Implants and with Normal Hearing

Identifieur interne : 000D53 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000D52; suivant : 000D54

Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children with Cochlear Implants and with Normal Hearing

Auteurs : Rachel L. See ; Virginia D. Driscoll ; Kate Gfeller ; Stephanie Kliethermes ; Jacob Oleson

Source :

RBID : PMC:3600096

Abstract

Background

Cochlear implant (CI) users have difficulty perceiving some intonation cues in speech and melodic contours because of poor frequency selectivity in the cochlear implant signal.

Objectives

To assess perceptual accuracy of normal hearing (NH) children and pediatric CI users on speech intonation (prosody), melodic contour, and pitch ranking, and to determine potential predictors of outcomes.

Hypothesis

Does perceptual accuracy for speech intonation or melodic contour differ as a function of auditory status (NH, CI), perceptual category (falling vs. rising intonation/contour), pitch perception, or individual differences (e.g., age, hearing history)?

Method

NH and CI groups were tested on recognition of falling intonation/contour vs. rising intonation/contour presented in both spoken and melodic (sung) conditions. Pitch ranking was also tested. Outcomes were correlated with variables of age, hearing history, HINT, and CNC scores.

Results

The CI group was significantly less accurate than the NH group in spoken (CI, M=63.1 %; NH, M=82.1%) and melodic (CI, M=61.6%; NH, M=84.2%) conditions. The CI group was more accurate in recognizing rising contour in the melodic condition compared with rising intonation in the spoken condition. Pitch ranking was a significant predictor of outcome for both groups in falling intonation and rising melodic contour; age at testing and hearing history variables were not predictive of outcomes.

Conclusions

Children with CIs were less accurate than NH children in perception of speech intonation, melodic contour, and pitch ranking. However, the larger pitch excursions of the melodic condition may assist in recognition of the rising inflection associated with the interrogative form.


Url:
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318287c985
PubMed: 23442568
PubMed Central: 3600096

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:3600096

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children with Cochlear Implants and with Normal Hearing</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="See, Rachel L" sort="See, Rachel L" uniqKey="See R" first="Rachel L." last="See">Rachel L. See</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Driscoll, Virginia D" sort="Driscoll, Virginia D" uniqKey="Driscoll V" first="Virginia D." last="Driscoll">Virginia D. Driscoll</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gfeller, Kate" sort="Gfeller, Kate" uniqKey="Gfeller K" first="Kate" last="Gfeller">Kate Gfeller</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kliethermes, Stephanie" sort="Kliethermes, Stephanie" uniqKey="Kliethermes S" first="Stephanie" last="Kliethermes">Stephanie Kliethermes</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Oleson, Jacob" sort="Oleson, Jacob" uniqKey="Oleson J" first="Jacob" last="Oleson">Jacob Oleson</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23442568</idno>
<idno type="pmc">3600096</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600096</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3600096</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1097/MAO.0b013e318287c985</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000D53</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000D53</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children with Cochlear Implants and with Normal Hearing</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="See, Rachel L" sort="See, Rachel L" uniqKey="See R" first="Rachel L." last="See">Rachel L. See</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Driscoll, Virginia D" sort="Driscoll, Virginia D" uniqKey="Driscoll V" first="Virginia D." last="Driscoll">Virginia D. Driscoll</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gfeller, Kate" sort="Gfeller, Kate" uniqKey="Gfeller K" first="Kate" last="Gfeller">Kate Gfeller</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kliethermes, Stephanie" sort="Kliethermes, Stephanie" uniqKey="Kliethermes S" first="Stephanie" last="Kliethermes">Stephanie Kliethermes</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Oleson, Jacob" sort="Oleson, Jacob" uniqKey="Oleson J" first="Jacob" last="Oleson">Jacob Oleson</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1531-7129</idno>
<idno type="e-ISSN">1537-4505</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec id="S1">
<title>Background</title>
<p id="P1">Cochlear implant (CI) users have difficulty perceiving some intonation cues in speech and melodic contours because of poor frequency selectivity in the cochlear implant signal.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Objectives</title>
<p id="P2">To assess perceptual accuracy of normal hearing (NH) children and pediatric CI users on speech intonation (prosody), melodic contour, and pitch ranking, and to determine potential predictors of outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Hypothesis</title>
<p id="P3">Does perceptual accuracy for speech intonation or melodic contour differ as a function of auditory status (NH, CI), perceptual category (falling vs. rising intonation/contour), pitch perception, or individual differences (e.g., age, hearing history)?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Method</title>
<p id="P4">NH and CI groups were tested on recognition of falling intonation/contour vs. rising intonation/contour presented in both spoken and melodic (sung) conditions. Pitch ranking was also tested. Outcomes were correlated with variables of age, hearing history, HINT, and CNC scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Results</title>
<p id="P5">The CI group was significantly less accurate than the NH group in spoken (CI, M=63.1 %; NH, M=82.1%) and melodic (CI, M=61.6%; NH, M=84.2%) conditions. The CI group was more accurate in recognizing rising contour in the melodic condition compared with rising intonation in the spoken condition. Pitch ranking was a significant predictor of outcome for both groups in falling intonation and rising melodic contour; age at testing and hearing history variables were not predictive of outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p id="P6">Children with CIs were less accurate than NH children in perception of speech intonation, melodic contour, and pitch ranking. However, the larger pitch excursions of the melodic condition may assist in recognition of the rising inflection associated with the interrogative form.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">100961504</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">22035</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Otol Neurotol</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Otol. Neurotol.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1531-7129</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1537-4505</issn>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23442568</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3600096</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MAO.0b013e318287c985</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS438546</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children with Cochlear Implants and with Normal Hearing</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>See</surname>
<given-names>Rachel L.</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>MA</degrees>
<aff id="A1">Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, School of Music, University of Iowa</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Driscoll</surname>
<given-names>Virginia D.</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>MA</degrees>
<aff id="A2">Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gfeller</surname>
<given-names>Kate</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>PhD</degrees>
<aff id="A3">Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa, Hospitals and Clinics, School of Music, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Iowa Cochlear, Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kliethermes</surname>
<given-names>Stephanie</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>MS</degrees>
<aff id="A4">Dept. of Biostatistics University of Iowa</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oleson</surname>
<given-names>Jacob</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>PhD</degrees>
<aff id="A5">Dept. of Biostatistics University of Iowa</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">Corresponding author: Virginia Driscoll,
<email>virginia-driscoll@uiowa.edu</email>
, 200 Hawkins Drive, 20133 PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted">
<day>6</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>4</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="pmc-release">
<day>01</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>34</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>490</fpage>
<lpage>498</lpage>
<abstract>
<sec id="S1">
<title>Background</title>
<p id="P1">Cochlear implant (CI) users have difficulty perceiving some intonation cues in speech and melodic contours because of poor frequency selectivity in the cochlear implant signal.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Objectives</title>
<p id="P2">To assess perceptual accuracy of normal hearing (NH) children and pediatric CI users on speech intonation (prosody), melodic contour, and pitch ranking, and to determine potential predictors of outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Hypothesis</title>
<p id="P3">Does perceptual accuracy for speech intonation or melodic contour differ as a function of auditory status (NH, CI), perceptual category (falling vs. rising intonation/contour), pitch perception, or individual differences (e.g., age, hearing history)?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Method</title>
<p id="P4">NH and CI groups were tested on recognition of falling intonation/contour vs. rising intonation/contour presented in both spoken and melodic (sung) conditions. Pitch ranking was also tested. Outcomes were correlated with variables of age, hearing history, HINT, and CNC scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Results</title>
<p id="P5">The CI group was significantly less accurate than the NH group in spoken (CI, M=63.1 %; NH, M=82.1%) and melodic (CI, M=61.6%; NH, M=84.2%) conditions. The CI group was more accurate in recognizing rising contour in the melodic condition compared with rising intonation in the spoken condition. Pitch ranking was a significant predictor of outcome for both groups in falling intonation and rising melodic contour; age at testing and hearing history variables were not predictive of outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p id="P6">Children with CIs were less accurate than NH children in perception of speech intonation, melodic contour, and pitch ranking. However, the larger pitch excursions of the melodic condition may assist in recognition of the rising inflection associated with the interrogative form.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Cochlear implants</kwd>
<kwd>pediatric</kwd>
<kwd>pitch perception</kwd>
<kwd>melodic contour</kwd>
<kwd>speech prosody</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<award-group>
<funding-source country="United States">National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders : NIDCD</funding-source>
<award-id>P50 DC000242 || DC</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D53 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000D53 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    OperaV1
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:3600096
   |texte=   Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children with Cochlear Implants and with Normal Hearing
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23442568" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OperaV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Thu Apr 14 14:59:05 2016. Site generation: Thu Oct 8 06:48:41 2020